THE
ATONEMENT BETWEEN GOD & MAN
<PAGE 83>
STUDY
III
THE
MEDIATOR OF THE ATONEMENT
THE ONLY BEGOTTEN ONE
"Who Is He?"--The Logos, a God--The Only Begotten
of Jehovah--The Bible's Testimony--"He Who Was Rich"--"Before
Abraham Was I Am"--"The First and the Last"--"Jehovah
Possessed Me in the Beginning" --The Logos Made Flesh--not
Incarnated--He Humbled Himself --"He Who Was Rich for Our
Sakes Became Poor"--No Hypocrisy in this Testimony--Our
Lord's Conduct not Deceptive--The Holy, Harmless, Undefiled
Separate from Sinners.
"There
is one God, and one Mediator between God and men, the man Christ
Jesus, who gave himself a ransom." 1 Tim. 2:5,6
IN
PROPORTION as we value the work of the Atonement --our reconciliation
to God, and the sacrifice for sin through which it is accomplished--in
the same proportion will we esteem him whom the Heavenly Father
set forth to be the propitiation for our sins, our Restorer and
Life-giver. Hence, in approaching the question, Who is this great
One whom Jehovah God has so highly honored, and who, by the grace
of God, is our Redeemer and Savior? it is befitting that we realize,
first of all, our own ignorance of the subject, and our incompetency
to reach a conclusion except as the divine Word shall instruct
us. Secondly, it is befitting, at the very outset of our investigation,
that we remember the Apostle's testimony respecting the greatness
of this Mediator, and the honor due to him. He says, "Him
hath God highly exalted, and given him a name that is above every
name, that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow." It
is written also, "That all men should honor the Son even
as they honor the Father." Phil. 2:9; John 5:23
Searching
the Scriptures carefully to note just what they do say, and what
they do not say, respecting our Lord Jesus,
<PAGE 84> we find their testimony very explicit,
harmonious and satisfactory. We will first state, in synoptical
form, what we find to be the Scriptural teaching, the proofs of
which we will give further along.
(1)
Our Redeemer existed as a spirit being before he was made flesh
and dwelt amongst men.
(2)
At that time, as well as subsequently, he was properly known as
"a god"--a mighty one. As chief of the angels and next
to the Father, he was known as the Archangel (highest angel or
messenger), whose name, Michael, signifies, "Who as God,"
or God's representative.
(3)
As he was the highest of all Jehovah's creation, so also he was
the first, the direct creation of God, the "Only Begotten,"
and then he, as Jehovah's representative, and in the exercise
of Jehovah's power, and in his name, created all things--angels,
principalities and powers, as well as the earthly creation.
(4)
When he was made flesh, to be our Redeemer, it was not of compulsion,
but a voluntary matter, the result of his complete harmony with
the Father, and his joyful acquiescence in carrying out every
feature of the divine will-- which he had learned to respect and
love, as the very essence of Justice, Wisdom and Love.
(5)
This humiliation to man's condition was not intended to be perpetual.
It accomplished its purpose when our Lord had given himself, a
human being, as our ransom, or "corresponding price."
Hence, his resurrection was not in the flesh, but, as the Apostle
declares, "He was put to death in the flesh but quickened
in spirit." 1 Pet. 3:18
(6)
His resurrection not only restored to him a spirit nature, but
in addition conferred upon him a still higher honor, and, as the
Father's reward for his faithfulness, made him partaker of the
divine nature--the very highest of the spirit natures,5
possessed of immortality.
<PAGE 85>
(7)
It is this great One, who has been thus highly exalted and honored
by Jehovah, whom we delight to honor and to worship and to serve,
as one with the Heavenly Father, in word, in work, in purpose
and in spirit.
Scripture
Testimony Respecting the Son of God
Let
us now consider the Scriptural evidences substantiating these
positions. We begin with the first chapter of John's Gospel. Here
our Lord, in his prehuman existence, is referred to as "The
Word" (Greek, Logos). "In the beginning was the
Logos." Dr. Alexander Clarke says, concerning this
word Logos: "This term should be left untranslated
for the same reason that the names Jesus and Christ
are left untranslated. As every appellative of the Savior of the
world was descriptive of some excellencies in his person, nature,
or work, so the epithet, Logos, which signifies a word,
a word spoken, speech, eloquence, doctrine, reason, or the faculty
of reason, is very properly applied to him." The Evangelist,
in his epistle, uses the same title in respect to our Lord again,
denominating him "the Word of life," or the "Logos
of life." 1 John 1:1
The
title, "Word of God"--"Logos of God"--is a
very fitting one by which to describe the important work or office
of our Master, prior to his coming into the world. The Logos
was the heavenly Father's direct expression of creation,
while all subsequent expressions of divine wisdom, power and goodness
were made through the Logos. It is said that in olden times
certain kings made addresses to their subjects by proxy, the king
sitting behind a screen, while his "word" or spokesman
stood before the screen, and addressed the people aloud on subjects
whispered to him by the king, who was not seen: and such a speaker
was termed "The King's Logos." Whether or not
the legend be true, it well illustrates the use of this word "Logos"
in connection with the prehuman existence of our Lord and Master
and his very
<PAGE 86> grand office as the Father's representative,
which the Scriptures, in this connection and elsewhere, point
out as having been his office.
Be
it noted that the Apostle, writing under inspiration, tells us
that "The Logos was in the beginning with the
God, and the Logos was a God." This is the
literal translation of the Greek, as can be readily confirmed
by any one, whether a Greek scholar or not. The Greek article
ho precedes the first word "God," in this verse,
and does not precede the second word "God," thus intentionally
indicating God the Father and God the Son in a case where without
the article the reader would be left in confusion. Similarly the
article precedes the word "God" in the second verse.
The entire verse therefore reads--
"In
the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with [ho theos]
the God, and the Word was [theos] a God. The same was in
the beginning with [ho theos] the God." John 1:1
What
"beginning" is here referred to? Surely not the
beginning of the existence of Jehovah, the God, the Father; because
he is "from everlasting to everlasting," and never had
a beginning. (Psa. 41:13; 90:2; 106:48) But Jehovah's
work had a beginning, and it is to this that reference is here
made--the beginning of creation. The statement, thus understood,
implies that our Lord Jesus, in his prehuman existence, as the
Logos, was with the Father in the very beginning of creation.
This confirms the inspired statement that the Logos himself
was "the beginning of the creation of God": this is
the precise statement of the Apostle, who assures us that our
Lord is not only "the Head of the body, the Church,"
and "the first-born from the dead," but also the beginning
of all creation--"that in all things he might have the
pre-eminence." His words are: "He is the image
of the invisible God--first born of all creation; because
by him were all things created, those in the heavens and those
on the earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or lordships,
or governments, or authorities: all things were created by him
and for him, and he precedes all things, and in him all things
<PAGE 87> have been permanently placed."
(Col. 1:15-18) Hear also the word of prophecy concerning the
Only Begotten, not only declaring his coming exaltation as King
of earthly kings, but describing him as already being Jehovah's
first-born, saying, "I will make him, my first-born,
higher than the kings of the earth." (Psa. 89:27) Note
also that our Lord (referring to his own origin), declares himself
to be, "The faithful and true witness, the beginning of
the creation of God." Rev. 3:14
In
harmony with this thought of our Lord's pre-eminence from the
very beginning, as the "first-born of every creature,"
and in harmony with the thought that he was the Logos or
Expression of the Heavenly Father, in respect to every matter,
is the next statement of the Evangelist's record, viz., "All
things through him came into existence; and without him came into
existence not even one thing which hath come into existence."
(John 1:3, Rotherham's translation.) What a grand thought
this gives us respecting the majesty of the Only Begotten Son
of God, the Logos! From this standpoint of his original
greatness and pre-eminence, we have a clearer view than from any
other of the import of the Apostle's words, "He who was
rich, for our sakes became poor, that we through his poverty
might become rich." (2 Cor. 8:9) From this standpoint
we can see how rich he was in the honor and glory of which he
himself made mention in prayer, saying, "Father, glorify
me with thine own self, with the glory which I had with thee
before the world was." (John 17:5) Although everything
connected with the divine plan of redemption is wonderful, astounding
in its manifestations of divine love, mercy, sympathy for fallen
men, yet, from this standpoint of view, all is reasonable--consistent
with the divine character and statement.
Those
who hold that our Lord Jesus never had an existence until he was
born a babe at Bethlehem have a very inferior view of the divine
plan for man's succor; and they are left without a use for the
many scriptures above cited, and others, relative to our Lord's
glory with the Father before the world was, relative to his great
stoop, in which he humbled
<PAGE 88> himself to take a nature a little
lower than the angelic, leaving therefore a nature that was above
that of angels. And the Scriptural view relieves us of all the
unreasonable and fallacious theories of men, by which, in attempting
to honor the Son, they have gone beyond the Word of God, and have
dishonored the Word of the Lord and the apostles, which declare
him to have been the Son or offspring of God, and that the Father
is greater than the Son. The false view has involved its millions
of adherents in inextricable difficulty in every direction.
The
truth alone is reasonable.
"---It's
true:
It satisfies our longings as nothing else can do."
These
statements respecting our Lord Jesus, that he was the beginning
of the creation of God, and that he had, therefore, an existence
long before he came into the world as a man, to be our Redeemer,
are fully confirmed by various scriptures, a sample of which is
the statement, "God sent his only begotten Son into the world
that we might have life through him." (1 John 4:9) Here
the statement most positively is that he was God's Son before
he came into the world, and that, as God's Son, he was given a
mission in the world to perform. Nor should it be overlooked that
here, as in many other instances, the Logos is designated
"The Only Begotten Son" of God. The thought conveyed
by this expression is that the Logos was himself the only
direct creation or begetting of the Heavenly Father, while all
others of God's sons (angels as well as men), were his indirect
creation through the Logos. Hence the propriety, the truthfulness,
of the statement, that he is the Only Begotten Son of God.
Take
another illustration: "God sent not his Son into the world
to condemn the world, but that the world through him might be
saved." (John 3:17) Here again his prehuman existence
is implied in the sending and mission. And these statements respecting
the Logos are in full accord
<PAGE 89> with the history of the matter,
presented to us by the Evangelist, who declares, "He was
in the world, and the world was made by him, and
the world knew him not." And again, "The Logos
was made flesh and dwelt amongst us, full of grace and truth;
and we beheld the glory of him, a glory as of an only begotten
one from a father." (John 1:10,14) Our Lord's own statements
respecting his pre-existence are indisputable. He never acknowledged
Joseph to be his father; nor did he ever acknowledge his earthly
life to be the beginning of his existence.
On
the contrary, notice that he continually referred to Jehovah as
his Father. Remember his words, "Say ye of him whom the Father
hath sanctified and sent into the world, Thou blasphemest,
because I said, I am the Son of God?" (John 10:36)
To Mary, his earthly mother, he said, "Wist ye not that I
must be about my Father's business?" (Luke 2:49)
To his disciples he declares, "I came down from heaven."
"I am the bread of life which came down from heaven."
(John 6:38,51) Many in his day disbelieved this, and many
disbelieve it still, but its truth remains. Some of those who
heard said, "How can this be?" And some of his disciples
said, when they heard it, "This is a hard saying: who can
hear it?" "When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples
murmured at it, he said unto them, Doth this offend you? What
and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he
was before?" "But from that time many of the disciples
went back and walked no more with him"; because of this claim
of heavenly origin and prehuman existence. John 6:60-66
Hear
him again before the Pharisees, proclaiming the same truth, saying,
"I know whence I came, and whither I go...I am from above,...I
am not of this world;...I proceeded forth and came from God; neither
came I of myself, but he sent me...It is my Father that heareth
me, and if I should say that I know him not, I shall be a liar."
Then said the Jews unto him, "Art thou greater than our Father
Abraham?" Jesus answered, "Your father Abraham rejoiced
to see my day: and he saw it and was glad." (Abraham
<PAGE 90> saw Christ's day with the eye of
faith; believing the divine promise respecting Messiah. He may
have seen his day of sacrifice, typified in the offering of Isaac
his only son, but at all events he saw Messiah's coming glory-day,
the Millennium, and its blessings upon all the families of the
earth, through this promised Seed. And no wonder the prospect
made him glad. He with the eye of faith beheld the heavenly city,
the New Jerusalem, the glorified Church, the Kingdom class, and
he beheld similarly the heavenly country --the world blessed by
that Kingdom. (Heb. 11:10,16; 12:22; 13:14)
"Then
said the Jews unto him [Jesus], Thou art not yet fifty years old,
and hast thou seen Abraham? [Abraham had been dead two thousand
years.] Jesus said unto them, Verily, verily I say unto you, before
Abraham was, I am." John 8:14,23,42-58
There
can be no mistake about the meaning of these words. Our Lord avers
that he existed before Abraham. Nor do the Scriptures in
any place intimate that the existence of the Only Begotten ever
ceased from the time it began, as "the beginning of the creation
of God," until it ceased at Calvary for three days; after
which he was raised from the dead to die no more, death having
never more dominion over him. (Rom. 6:9) The incident of his
birth as a human being, "a little lower than the angels,"
for the purpose of being man's sin-sacrifice, did not involve
a death to the spirit nature preceding the birth as a human babe,
but merely a transference of his life from a higher or spirit
nature to a lower or human nature. Hence our Lord's words, "Before
Abraham was I am," signify that there had been no
cessation of his existence at any time in the interim, and positively
identifies Jesus, the Son of God, in the flesh, with the Logos,
the first-born of all creation. Of course our Lord's testimony
was not received by many who heard it, nor has it been received
by many since. There seems to be a perversity of disposition,
which leads mankind to reject the simple, plain statements of
the Lord's Word, and to prefer to regard our Lord either as a
sinful member of the fallen
<PAGE 91> race, or else as his own father.
Only the meek are ready to "receive with meekness the engrafted
word, which is able to make truly wise," and only for such
is the Word of God's testimony intended. (Isa. 61:1; Jas.
1:21) As those who heard the Master, and rejected his testimony,
took up stones against him, so some who hear the truth and reject
it now are ready to stone, figuratively, all who accept and teach
the Master's words, in their simplicity. And now, as then, the
reason is because they know neither the Father, nor the Son, as
they ought to know them--as they reveal themselves.
Our
Lord's words are still applicable to the case, viz., "No
man knoweth the Son but the Father, neither knoweth any man the
Father save the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him."
(Matt. 11:27) The world knew him not: knew not of his high
origin, and his great humiliation on its behalf; and when we remember
that a long period of time probably intervened between the beginning
of the creation in the person of our Lord, and the time when he
was made flesh, and when further we remember that during all that
period he was with the Father, "daily his delight, rejoicing
always before him," we cannot wonder that the Son knew the
Father, as his disciples and the world knew him not--as we are
learning to know him through his Word of revelation and the unfoldment
of his wonderful plan of the ages. Hear him again declare, "O
righteous Father, the world hath not known thee, but I have known
thee." John 17:25
The
key to this wonderful knowledge of heavenly things is furnished
in the statement, "He that is of the earth is earthy, and
speaketh of the earth; he that cometh from heaven is above all,
and what he hath seen and heard, that he testifies."
(John 3:31,32) No wonder, then, that even his opponents asked,
"Whence hath this man this wisdom?" (Matt. 13:54)
And it was his knowledge of heavenly things, his intimate and
long acquaintance with the Father, begetting absolute faith in
the Father's promises, which enabled him, as a perfect man, to
overcome the world, the flesh and the devil, and to present an
acceptable sacrifice for our sins.
<PAGE 92> Thus it was written beforehand through
the Prophet: "By his knowledge shall my righteous
servant justify many, while he will bear their iniquities."
Isa. 53:11
Now,
only those who walk by faith, in the light of the divine Word,
may know either the Father or the Son, or clearly and rightly
appreciate the great work of atonement which they unitedly are
accomplishing for humanity. But ere long, after the selection
of the Church has been completed, after the Bride, the Lamb's
wife, has been associated with her Lord in glory, and the Kingdom
shall have come-- then the knowledge of the Lord shall be caused
to fill the whole earth, and the power of the Father, which, through
the Logos, created all things, shall be exerted through
him, as the Savior, in the restoration and perfecting of those
who, when privileged to know him, shall yield to his righteous
requirements, so that ultimately our Lord's power, as Jehovah's
agent in creation, shall be fully equaled and exemplified in his
power, as Jehovah's agent in restoring and blessing the world;
and thus will be fulfilled the prediction of the Psalmist--"Thou
hast the dew [freshness, vigor] of thy youth." Psa. 110:3
Hearken
to our Lord's words to Nicodemus, who sought to know something
of heavenly things, but who was refused the knowledge, because
he had not yet believed the earthly things. Our Lord, in explaining
to him his knowledge of heavenly things, says, "No man hath
ascended up to heaven but he that came down from heaven, even
the Son of Man."6
Our Lord then proceeds to show Nicodemus the provision which God
has made for the world, that they should not perish, but have
eternal life, declaring, "God so loved the world that he
gave his Only Begotten Son, that whosoever believeth on
him should not perish but have everlasting life." John 3:13,16
The
Logos, the beginning of the creation of God, called also
by Isaiah the Wonderful, Counsellor, the Mighty God, etc. (Isa.
9:6), we find described by Solomon, and represented
<PAGE 93> under the name of Wisdom, yet with
all the details which harmonize the statement with the account
given by John the Evangelist (John 1:1,18), as follows:
"Jehovah
possessed me in the beginning of his way, before his ways of old.
I was set up from everlasting, from the beginning, or ever the
earth was [formed]. When there were no depths [seas] I was brought
forth: when there were no fountains abounding with water. Before
the mountains were set before the hills, was I brought forth;
while as yet he had not made the earth, nor the fields, nor the
highest part of the dust of the world. When he prepared the heavens
I was there: when he set a compass upon the face of the depth:
when he established the clouds above: when he strengthened the
fountains of the deep: when he gave to the sea his decree, that
the waters should not pass his command: when he appointed the
fountains of the earth: then was I by him, as one brought up
with him; and I was daily his delight, rejoicing always
before him." Prov. 8:22-30
In
addition to what we have here noted respecting the Logos--that
he was not only the beginning of the creation of God, and the
first-born, but additionally his Only Begotten Son, and that all
other creations were by and through him--we find a beautiful corroborative
statement in our Lord's own words, saying: "Fear not, I am
the first and the last; I am he that liveth and
was dead, and behold I am alive forevermore." And again,
"These things saith the first and the last,
which was dead, and is alive." (Rev. 1:17; 2:8) In
no other sense or way than as the "Only" direct
creation of God, through whom all else was created, could our
Lord be the first and the last of God's creation. Any other view,
therefore, would be an incorrect one, and in conflict with all
the foregoing scriptures.
"The Logos Was Made Flesh and Dwelt Among
Us"
--John 1:14--
The
common thought in respect to our Lord's manifestation in the flesh
is usually expressed in the word incarnation.
<PAGE 94> This usual thought we believe to
be wholly incorrect, unscriptural. The Incarnation theory
is that our Lord's human body, which was born of Mary, was merely
a clothing, a covering for the spiritual body. The
thought therefore attached to our Lord's earthly life, according
to this theory, is that our Lord during his earthly life was still
a spirit being, exactly as before, except that he used the flesh
that was born of Mary, and that was known as the man Christ Jesus,
as his veil or medium of communication with mankind, after the
manner in which angels had appeared in human form in previous
times--to Abraham, to Manoah, to Lot, and others. (Gen. 18:1,2;
19:1; Judges 13:9-11,16) Because of this incorrect premise,
many confused and unscriptural ideas have been evolved respecting
the various incidents of our Lord's life and death: for instance,
this theory assumes that our Lord's weariness was not real, but
feigned; because he, as a spirit being, could know no weariness.
The logic of this theory would imply also that our Lord's prayers
were feigned, because, says this theory, he was God himself, and
to pray would have been to pray to himself; hence it is argued
that his prayers were merely pro forma, to make an impression
upon the disciples and those who were about. The same theory is
bound to suppose that our Lord's death was merely an appearance
of death, for they argue that Jesus was God the Father, who being
from everlasting to everlasting, cannot die: hence that the apparent
agony and cry, "My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?"
and the dying, were merely pro forma, to make the impression
upon the minds of those who heard and saw. The logical argument
of this theory, therefore, is that there was no real death for
man's sins, but merely an appearance of one, a spectacular effect,
a dramatic show, a Cinematographic representation, a deception
produced for a good purpose--to favorably influence the sympathies
and sensibilities of mankind.
All
of this is wrong, and violently in opposition to the truth on
the subject, as presented in the Word of God. The Scriptural declaration
is not that our Lord assumed a body
<PAGE 95> of flesh as a covering for a spiritual
body, as did the angels previously; but that he actually laid
aside, or, as the Greek renders it, "divested himself of,"
his prehuman conditions, and actually took our nature,
or, as our text above declares, "the Logos was made
flesh." There was no fraud, no sham, about it: it was
not that he merely appeared to humble himself, while really retaining
his glory and power: it was not that he seemed to become poor
for our sakes, yet actually remained rich in the possession of
the higher spiritual nature all the time: it was not that he merely
put on the clothing, the livery, of a servant. No, but he actually
became a man-- "the man Christ Jesus, who gave himself
a ransom for all." 1 Tim. 2:5
We
shall see subsequently, when we come to consider particularly
the ransom feature of his work, that it was absolutely necessary
that he should be a man--neither more nor less than a perfect
man--because it was a man that sinned, man who was to be redeemed,
and the divine law required that a man's life should pay the redemption
price for a man's life. "As by a man came death, by
a man also came the resurrection of the dead." (1
Cor. 15:21) But let no one misunderstand us by this to mean
that our Redeemer became a man such as we are, full of inherited
imperfections and blemishes. Quite to the contrary of this: the
same word of God declares that he was "holy, harmless, separate
from sinners." Heb. 7:26,28; Luke 1:35
His
separateness from sinners is one of the difficult points with
many. How could he be a man, and yet be free from the hereditary
taint which affects the entire human family? We hope to see exactly
how this could be, and how it was accomplished under the divine
plan; but we require first to have thoroughly impressed upon our
minds the fact that an imperfect man, a blemished man, one who
through heredity had partaken of Adamic stock, and whose life
was thus part with our life, could not be our Redeemer.
There were plenty of sinful men in the world, without God sending
his Son to be another. There were plenty of these imperfect men
who were willing to lay down their lives for the accomplishment
<PAGE 96> of the Father's will. This is fully
attested by the record of Hebrews 11, in which it is clearly
shown that many "counted not their lives dear unto them,"
in their faithfulness to the Lord. But what was needed was not
merely a sacrifice for sins, but a sinless sacrifice,
which would thus pay the sinner's penalty. And since "all
have sinned and come short of the glory of God," and since
"there is none righteous, no, not one," therefore,
as the Scriptures again declare, "None could give to God
a ransom for his brother." (Rom. 3:10,23; Psa. 49:7)
It was because the Lord beheld and saw that there was no man competent
to redeem the world that he laid help upon one who is mighty to
save--able to save to the uttermost all who come unto the Father
by him. Psa. 89:19; Isa. 63:1; 59:16; Heb. 7:25
Next
we want, if possible, to see clearly how our Lord Jesus laid hold
upon our race, and became a member of it, through his mother Mary,
without sharing to any degree its depravity, without inheriting
its blight of sin, without its curse of death laying hold upon
him: for if in any manner or degree he partook of the life
of Adam, he would have been a partaker also of the death sentence
upon Adam's life, and thus he would have come under the sentence
of death: and if rendered thus imperfect, and under the sentence
of death, he had no life-rights to give as man's ransom
price, by which to purchase father Adam and his race from under
the sentence of death imposed by divine Justice. We propose to
examine this question in our next chapter. We hope to there prove
that our Lord did not, in any manner or degree, become contaminated
with sin or imperfection through his mother.
THE
ATONEMENT BETWEEN GOD & MAN |